By NemesisVex
Filed: Technophilia Aural

As deep as I am into home studio recording, I'm not much of a synthesizer guy. For the longest time, I used preset sounds because I had no idea what all those knobs and settings did. Even after taking classes on synthesis, I'm probably more inclined to use sampled sounds than to create my own. I pretty much write music for live bands, but I don't have a band. So I use synthesizers and samplers.

Cakewalk recently released SONAR 7, the 2007 update of their flagship digital audio workstation software. The company has also bundled SONAR 7 with its other large products -- Project5, Rapture and Dimension Pro -- into a package called Cakewalk Pro Suite. The bundle sells for about $799 retail, but since I own SONAR 5 Producer Edition, I qualify for an upgrade price of $479. The upgrade price to SONAR 7 Producer Edition is $229. For $250 more, I can get software that would cost $707 to get separately with entirely new licenses.

So that begs the question -- do I need them?

This past weekend, I downloaded demos of Rapture and Project5. No demo of Dimension Pro is available, although I read somewhere on the Cakewalk forum that the Rapture demo is similar to Dimension Pro.

Rapture is a synthesizer, and Dimension Pro is a sampler. Given my preference for sampled sounds, I'm not so much interested in Rapture as Dimension Pro. The user interface between Dimension Pro and Rapture look similar, so I gave Rapture a shot.

The narrow buttons with the squat text made it hard to figure out the signal flow. A bit of random clicking allowed me to guess what were oscillators, filters and envelopes, but I couldn't be too sure. Since Rapture has no sampling capabilities, I couldn't really project how Dimension would compare. The user interface seems a bit busy, but I don't really expect to use it all that much. I do wish a Dimension Pro demo was available though.

As for Project5, it's definitely the product with which Cakewalk wants to compete with Ableton Live. I was introduced to Ableton Live before Project5, so I already had some expectations. When I was first working with Live, the tutorials really helped explain the user interface. The Project5 tutorials didn't do nearly the same kind of job selling its interface.

As a result, I found it clunky and a bit left-brained. I attempted to recreate Terry Riley's In C in Project5 the way I did with Live. Project5 isn't as liberal as Live when it comes to clashing time signatures, and it forced unison playing whenever I triggered new clips in its Groove Matrix (analogous to Live's Session View.) Unison is not good for a performance of In C. Although the feature set is parallel, Live can support VST and includes its own arsenal of proprietary instruments. Project5 is pretty much a host for other software synthesizers.

Its support of Rewire is even harder to handle than SONAR. With SONAR, I can assign multiple tracks to a single Reason song file. In Project5, I have to create track layers, which adds too much complexity to a process that should be straightforward. I'm also having a hard time picturing a Rewire connection between Project5 and SONAR. I actually think SONAR handles a few things better than Project5.

As tempted as I am to spend the extra money for the Cakewalk Pro Suite, dropping cash on software I probably won't end up using is wasteful. I am still curious about Dimension Pro because it comes bundled with the Garritan Pocket Orchestra. At some point, I'd be interested in writing more classically-minded works, and I'm in the market for a good library. (There is a version of the Garritan Personal Orchestra available for Reason as a Refill.)

So that led me to explore Native Instruments Kontakt, a sampler which contains portions of the Vienna Symphonic Library. The demo didn't include any of it, but I did try it out to see how well it worked.

With SONAR 5, the Kontakt demo seemed very straight forward. I assigned the audio output and MIDI channel of a MIDI track to Kontakt, and it played the samples with no problem. I would like to try out some of the guitar samples -- the detail with which you can articulate the sample in such an idiomatic manner looks really powerful -- but they weren't included in the demo either.

I did see reports of SONAR 7 and Kontakt 3 not getting along, but I wonder if that's the case for a new installation of Kontakt. As much of a failure Finale has turned out for me, it did yield a nice upgrade path for Kontakt -- the GPO Player in Finale qualifies for a competitive cross grade.

Despite those reports of Kontakt 3 crashing SONAR, I might still invest in it. I'd like to shake up the sound of my demos, and as helpful as Reason has been, I feel like I need more options.

Share: [Facebook] [Twitter] [Delicious]

Post a comment

Members: Log in to your account to pre-populate your personal information.
Non-members: Remember personal info? Yes No


About this weblog

「作譜」 is pronounced "sakufu", and it means "log" or "work file" in Japanese. It's not the correct translation of "weblog", but it seems appropriate for this site.

This site started as a general dumping ground for external links, but these days, it's where I think about things related to the various technologies with which I work -- digital audio, web software engineering.

[RSS]


Search



Links